http://jurnalpaedagogia.com/index.php/pdg/issue/feed Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan 2025-09-26T05:13:03+00:00 Saepudin Mashuri paedagogia@iainpalu.ac.id Open Journal Systems <p><strong>Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan</strong> is an Open Access Journal published by Faculty of Education and Teacher Training at State Islamic Institute, Palu. Paedagogia is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on education and instruction including: research on learning and teaching strategies, curriculum development, assessment and material development, teacher development and educational evaluation policy.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Journal History:&nbsp;</strong>Paedagogia: Journal Pendidikan was first published in 2012 in print P-ISSN&nbsp;<a href="https://issn.lipi.go.id/terbit/detail/1344570229">2302-3066</a>&nbsp;(SK No. 0005.016/JI.3.2/SK.ISSN/2012.09), then in 2017 it was published online E-ISSN&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="https://issn.lipi.go.id/terbit/detail/1493778517">2580-0477</a> (SK No. 0005.25800477/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2017.05). The first Accreditation application was submitted in 2019 and was granted in 2020 at Fifth Grade " SINTA 5" (<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AmpYmUEkoCBzobZvoba0IzlEEuwTow2r/view?usp=sharing">SK: 85/M/KPT/2020</a>) and increased at Third Grade "SINTA 3" after reaccreditation in 2022 by Ministry of Research and Technology/National Agency for Research and Innovation, Republic of Indonesia (<a href="https://jurnalpaedagogia.com/docs/sk_akreditasi.pdf">SK Nomor 204/E/KPT/2022</a>). Since the 2017 issue. Paedagogia has become a member of CrossRef with DOI so that all articles published will have an unique DOI number. The journal used PKP Preservation Network (PN) for archiving.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>FOCUS</strong></p> <p>FOCUS: Through the publication of articles, Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan aims to provide readers with a better understanding of education from various perspectives, through library research and fieldwork studies, as well as the latest developments in education.</p> <p><strong>SCOPE</strong></p> <p>Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan calls for scientists, academics, researchers, practitioners, and observers in the field of Education to publish the result of their research that focuses on:</p> <ol> <li class="show">Higher education.</li> <li class="show">Educational management.</li> <li class="show">Educational technology.</li> <li class="show">Educational curriculum development</li> <li class="show">Special needs education.</li> <li class="show">Global issues in education</li> <li class="show">Technical and vocational education.</li> <li class="show">Other areas in education (including Islamic Education)</li> </ol> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> http://jurnalpaedagogia.com/index.php/pdg/article/view/598 Bridging the Digital Divide: Artificial Intelligence Adoption Among Lecturers in Kaduna State, Nigeria 2025-09-04T04:56:39+00:00 Muhammad Auwal Yakubu yakubuaw@gmail.com Zohaib Hassan Sain zohaib3746@gmail.com Uthman Shehu Lawal shehulawal@gmail.com Aries Musnandar ariesmus@gmail.com <p>This study investigates the awareness, adoption, and impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies among lecturers in Kaduna State, Nigeria. It addresses three primary research questions: the extent of lecturers' awareness of AI-powered educational tools, the types of AI technologies currently adopted, and the impact of these technologies on academic activities. Utilizing a descriptive survey design, data were collected from a sample of 420 academic staff across four tertiary institutions using a validated instrument based on a modified Likert scale. The study employs one-sample t-tests to evaluate three hypotheses about awareness, adoption, and impact. Findings reveal that lecturers possess moderate awareness of AI applications and are highly familiar with plagiarism detection and content creation tools but need more understanding of intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning platforms. Adoption is selective; AI-powered research assistants and content creation tools are widely used, while technologies like Natural Language Processing (NLP) are less common. The study identifies a positive impact of AI on academic activities, enhancing collaboration and resource accessibility while raising ethical concerns. Statistical analyses indicate significant differences in awareness levels, adoption rates, and perceived impacts among lecturers. These findings suggest varied engagement with AI tools across educational settings in Kaduna State. The study concludes that while there is a positive perception of AI's educational impact, improvements in training and infrastructure are necessary to leverage these technologies fully. Recommendations include organizing workshops to increase familiarity with underutilized AI tools, integrating AI training into professional development, and establishing guidelines for ethical AI use in education.</p> 2025-09-03T12:26:13+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan http://jurnalpaedagogia.com/index.php/pdg/article/view/781 Examining Productivity Skills and Academic Stress among High School Students at Ipil Montessori Academy in the Philippines 2025-09-26T05:13:03+00:00 Sarah Jane Magallanes sarahjanemagallanes3807@gmail.com Ruben Perater peraterruben@gmail.com Rosejane Magdua rosejanemagdua76@gmail.com Clonny Liza Orditor clonnyorditor@gmail.com Jomer Macrohon jomermacrohon@gmail.com Ronalyn Surtida ronalynsurtida47@gmail.com Dayrylle May Deniega dayryllemaed@gmail.com Kassie Engaling kassieengaling@gmail.com Mary Frietz Ariola frietz16@icloud.com Danica Cagurin Cagurindanica@gmail.com <p>This study investigated the relationship between productivity skills, with a focus on time management, and academic stress among high school students at Ipil Montessori Academy. Specifically, it aimed to determine the level of productivity skills among students, examine whether productivity skills differ by gender, and explore the association between productivity skills and academic stress. A quantitative correlational design was employed, involving 100 randomly selected participants from junior and senior high school levels, consisting of 61 females and 39 males, with ages ranging from 12 to 17 years. Data were collected using two standardized instruments, the Time Management Inventory and the Academic Stress Inventory, both of which demonstrated high internal consistency. Descriptive analysis revealed that students exhibited moderate productivity skills overall, with neutral attitudes toward time and moderate ability in time planning and managing time-consuming activities. Analysis of gender differences indicated no significant variations in productivity skills or academic stress levels, showing that both male and female students adopt similar approaches. The results further showed that academic stress among respondents was generally at an indifferent level, with group study stress emerging as the highest source of stress and teacher-related stress as the lowest. Correlational analysis indicated no significant relationship between productivity skills and academic stress. These findings suggest that while students demonstrate moderate productivity and neutral stress levels, productivity skills alone are insufficient to explain academic stress, highlighting the need to consider additional personal and contextual factors.</p> 2025-09-26T02:21:40+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Paedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan